GENERATION EVOLUTIONAL FIT
Part 1
With Census Bureau data, Pew Research had determined that the
Millennial generation, ages 18-34 in 2015, had become the majority workforce by
mid-2015. First generation controlled organizations
and companies built their success on conducting business with an understanding
of their own generations motivations and tendencies. Technology evolved so rapidly over the past
20 years during the youth of the Millennial generation that the generation was
arguably wedged between ways of the past and present. Companies that don’t contemplate these
generational differences and curtail their modes of operations are missing
opportunities to cohabitate and benefit from the Millennial generation as a
workforce and customer pool.
This is a multi-stage mini check your Generation Evolutional Fit.
The Millennial Generation grew up
in a system where society and high school guidance counselors pushed college at
all costs. Millennials were taught that the
path to a good life is through college and in offices and not through skilled
trades. Where studies support this
mantra via earnings potential created by a college degree, there is a potential
suppression of environmental fit for many Millennials fitting into the office
and screen mold. Combine this with the
plague of limited jobs effecting this generation and companies will be
challenged with motivation and performance.
Rather it is being outdoors some
of the time, fixing or creating something with one’s hands, or spatially interacting
with the end product versus applying theoretical components, companies should
understand where their flexibility in operations can broaden a work environment
and the benefits that can reap. Over a
span of 225 academic studies, researchers Lyubomirsky, King, and Diener performed
a meta-analysis that found life satisfaction and successful business outcomes
have a considerable directional causality (https://hbr.org/2012/01/positive-intelligence).
Look for operational flexibility to
work outside of normal business hours, field versus office time, and cross
training. Create a program of it with
quantifiable metrics and allow it to be an option for employees. Think of the possibilities in recruiting, retention,
and successful business outcomes. If
flexibility is not possible, then ensure your hiring process screens for your
absolutes and that you are not fitting square pegs into round holes.
Anchor, Shawn. Positive
Intelligence. Harvard Business Review, January-February 2012. 22 March
2016. <https://hbr.org/2012/01/positive-intelligence>
For more information on the host of this blog, visit http://vitalcoreconsultants.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment